Student Appraisal of Teachers
Name of the College : M.E.S. College of Commerce, Sirsi (U.K)
 

 

 

 

 

 

SNO

 

 

 

 

 

 

NAME OF THE TEACHER

RATING FACTORS – POINT OF SCALE
PREPARATION FOR THE CLASS PANCTUALITY IN CONDUCTING CLASSES PLANNING AND COMPLETION OF SYLLABUS ON TIME CLARITY OF PRESENTATION CLARITY OF EXPRESSION LIKE LANGUAGE AND VOICE METHODOLOGY USED TO IMPART THE KNOWLEDGE ACTIVE LEARNING METHODOLOGY USED TO IMPART AVAILABILITY TO STUDENTS OUTSIDE THE CLASS HOURS HIS/HER ROLE AS A LEADER EXAMINATIONS / ASSIGNMENTS GRADED FAIRLY AVERAGE
1 Prof.S.S.Baadgaonkar 4.34 4.76 4.48 4.36 3.796 4.28 3.94 4.3 4.32 4.42 4.3
2 Prof.S.M.Hegde 4.16 3.56 3.56 4.16 4.16 3.32 4 4.52 4.44 4.16 4.004
3 Dr.S.K.Hegde 4.54 4.36 4.6 4.5 4.2 4.26 4.34 4.44 3.32 4.32 4.288
4 Prof. R.M.Sammasgeekar 3.2 4 3.45 3 3.8 4.3 3.3 3.9 3.5 3.9 3.635
5 Prof.Sudhir Shanbhag 4.28 3.72 4.2 4.24 4.32 4.2 4.16 4.12 4.24 4.44 4.192
6 Prof.Savita R. 4.35 3.9 4.1 3.65 3.25 3.65 4 3.75 3.6 3.65 3.79
7 Prof.Harsha Prabhu 4.92 4.67 4.57 4.25 4.42 4.4 4.48 4.4 4.1 4.27 4.448
8 Prof. Anwesha Naik 4.44 4.72 4.68 3.92 4.24 4.44 4.2 4.48 4.2 4.36 4.368
9 Prof. Vinay Hegde 3.9 3.7 3.95 4.35 4 4.1 3.85 4.15 3.85 4.4 4.025
10 Prof. Ravindra Hegde 4.66 4.4 4.56 4.3 4.42 4.46 3.9 4.3 4.24 4.52 4.376
11 Prof. Renita Dsouza 3.5 4.1 3.67 3.7 3.1 3.13 3.25 3.6 3.24 3.78 3.507
12 Prof. Anandrao Kumbar 3.46 4.2 3.65 3.8 3.54 3.33 3.25 3.43 3.24 3.8 3.57
13 Prof. Geeta Madival 4.57 4.36 4.5 4.7 4.2 4.29 4.35 4.44 3.42 4.35 4.25
14 Prof. Sachin Bhat 4.92 4.67 4.57 4.25 4.42 4.4 4.48 4.4 4.1 4.27 4.448
Average Weightage Score of 20 Students of B.Com I, II & III
Rated the Teacher using the following Five Point Scale :
Unsatisfactory : Less than 2 Satisfactory : Between 2 and 3 Good : Between 3 and 4 Excellent : Between 4 and 5

 

Student Appraisal : Subject-wise : Commerce Faculty
Name of the College : M.E.S. College of Commerce, Sirsi (U.K)
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SNO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SUBJECTS

RATING FACTORS – POINT OF SCALE
PREPARATION FOR THE CLASS PANCTUALITY IN CONDUCTING CLASSES PLANNING AND COMPLETION OF SYLLABUS ON TIME CLARITY OF PRESENTATION CLARITY OF EXPRESSION LIKE LANGUAGE AND VOICE METHODOLOGY USED TO IMPART THE KNOWLEDGE ACTIVE LEARNING METHODOLOGY USED TO IMPART AVAILABILITY TO STUDENTS OUTSIDE THE CLASS HOURS HIS/HER ROLE AS A LEADER EXAMINATIONS / ASSIGNMENTS GRADED FAIRLY  

AVERAGE

1 Cost Accounting 4.34 4.76 4.48 4.36 3.796 4.28 3.94 4.3 4.32 4.42 4.2996
2 Income Tax Law & Practice 4.16 3.56 3.56 4.16 4.16 3.32 4 4.52 4.44 4.16 4.004
3 Financial Accounting 3.2 4 3.45 3 3.8 4.3 3.3 3.9 3.5 3.9 3.635
4 Management Accounting 4.44 4.72 4.68 3.92 4.24 4.44 4.2 4.48 4.2 4.36 4.368
5 Principles & Practice of Auditing 3.6 4.02 3.7 3.68 3.18 3.22 3.28 3.56 3.18 3.6 3.502
6 Law & Practice of Banking 3.46 4.2 3.65 3.8 3.54 3.33 3.25 3.43 3.24 3.8 3.57
7 Statistics 4.66 4.4 4.56 4.3 4.42 4.46 3.9 4.3 4.24 4.52 4.376
8 Commercial Arithmetic 4.6 3.9 3.9 4.6 4.6 4.4 3.8 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.24
9 Business Communication Skill 3.5 4.1 3.67 3.7 3.1 3.13 3.25 3.6 3.24 3.78 3.507
10 Entrepreneurship Development 3.45 3.98 3.52 3.66 3.25 3.13 3.21 3.41 3.2 3.5 3.431
11 Computer Application in Business 4.92 4.67 4.57 4.25 4.42 4.4 4.48 4.4 4.1 4.27 4.448
12 Principles of Foreign Exchange 3.9 3.7 3.95 4.35 4 4.1 3.85 4.15 3.85 4.4 4.025
13 Industrial Economics 4.55 4.35 4.6 4.05 3.8 4 4.1 3.95 4.45 4.6 4.245
14 English 4.35 3.9 4.1 3.65 3.25 3.65 4 3.75 3.6 3.65 3.79
Average Weightage Score of 20 Students of B.Com I, II & III
Rated the Teacher using the following Five Point Scale :
Unsatisfactory : Less than 2 Satisfactory : Between 2 and 3 Good : Between 3 and 4 Excellent : Between 4 and 5
Student Appraisal : Subject-wise : Commerce Faculty

 

English Industrial Economics Principles of Foreign Exchange

Computer Application in Business Entrepreneurship Development Business Communication Skill Commercial Arithmetic

Statistics                             Law & Practice of Banking Principles & Practice of Auditing Management Accounting Financial Accounting

Income Tax Law & Practice

Cost Accounting

0             0.5             1             1.5             2             2.5             3             3.5             4             4.5             5

 

STUDENT FEEDBACK ANALYSIS REPORT:

 

Name of the Teacher : Prof. S. S. Baadgaonkar
Course : B.Com
Semester : IV and VI Semester 2020-21
No’s of Students Enrolled : 480
Number of Students Participated

in the Feedback

: 80
Subject taught : Cost Accounting
Average Feedback & Score of the

Programme

: Average Score : 4.3
Feedback Score Range : Lowest Score : 3.796

Highest Score : 4.76

Areas of Performance

Improvement

: Clarity of expression needs to be strengthened.
Comments (If any) :
Action Taken : In one-to-one communication brought to the notice

of the teacher.

Remarks : Excellent

 

Name of the Teacher : Prof. S. M. Hegde
Course : B.Com
Semester : IV & VI Semester 2020-21
No’s of Students Enrolled : 480
Number of Students Participated

in the Feedback

: 80
Subject taught : Income Tax, Corporate Accounting
Average Feedback & Score of the

Programme

: Average Score: 4
Feedback Score Range : Lowest Score : 3.32

Highest Score : 4.52

Areas of Performance

Improvement

: Methodology used to impart knowledge needs to

be strengthened.

Comments (If any) :
Action Taken : In face to face contact necessary suggestion has

been given.

Remarks : Excellent

 

Name of the Teacher : Dr. S. K. Hegde
Course : B.Com
Semester : II & IV Semester 2020-21
No’s of Students Enrolled : 480
Number of Students Participated

in the Feedback

: 80
Subject taught : Managerial Economics and International

Economics

Average Feedback & Score of the

Programme

: Average Score: 4.28
Feedback Score Range : Lowest Score : 3.32

Highest Score : 4.6

Areas of Performance

Improvement

: Improvement in Leadership
Comments (If any) :
Action Taken : The area to be improved has been communicated

to the teacher.

Remarks : Excellent

 

 

 

Name of the Teacher : Prof. Rajaneesh Samasgeekar
Course : B.Com
Semester : II Semester 2020-21
No’s of Students Enrolled : 120
Number of Students Participated

in the Feedback

: 20
Subject taught : Financial Accounting
Average Feedback & Score of the

Programme

: Average Score: 3.635
Feedback Score Range : Lowest Score : 3

Highest Score : 4.3

Areas of Performance

Improvement

: Clarity of presentation
Comments (If any) :
Action Taken : Requisite instruction given.
Remarks : Good

 

Name of the Teacher : Prof. Sudheer Shanbhag
Course : B.Com
Semester : VI Semester 2020-21
No’s of Students Enrolled : 360
Number of Students Participated

in the Feedback

: 60
Subject taught : Computer Application in Business
Average Feedback & Score of the

Programme

: Average Score: 4.192
Feedback Score Range : Lowest Score : 3.72

Highest Score : 4.44

Areas of Performance

Improvement

: Role as a Leader
Comments (If any) :
Action Taken : Area of Improvement needs to be strengthened.
Remarks : Excellent

 

Name of the Teacher : Prof. Savita Ravindranath
Course : B.Com
Semester : II Semester 2020-21
No’s of Students Enrolled : 480
Number of Students Participated

in the Feedback

: 80
Subject taught : Basic English and Additional English
Average Feedback & Score of the

Programme

: Average Score: 3.79
Feedback Score Range : Lowest Score : 3.25

Highest Score : 4.35

Areas of Performance

Improvement

: Clarity of Expression, Language and Voice
Comments (If any) :
Action Taken : Area of Improvement passed on to the teacher.
Remarks : Good

 

 

 

Name of the Teacher : Prof. Harsha Prabhu
Course : B.Com
Semester : IV Semester 2020-21
No’s of Students Enrolled : 360
Number of Students Participated

in the Feedback

: 60
Subject taught : Computer Application in Business
Average Feedback & Score of the

Programme

: Average Score: 4.448
Feedback Score Range : Lowest Score : 4.1

Highest Score : 4.92

Areas of Performance

Improvement

: Availability to students outside the class hours.
Comments (If any) :
Action Taken : The Area of Improvement is intimated to the

teacher.

Remarks : Excellent

 

Name of the Teacher : Prof. Anwesha Naik
Course : B.Com
Semester : VI Semester 2020-21
No’s of Students Enrolled : 600
Number of Students Participated

in the Feedback

: 100
Subject taught : Management Accounting and Business Law
Average Feedback & Score of the

Programme

: Average Score: 4.368
Feedback Score Range : Lowest Score : 3.92

Highest Score : 4.72

Areas of Performance

Improvement

: Clarity of Presentation
Comments (If any) :
Action Taken : Conveyed to the teacher.
Remarks : Excellent

 

Name of the Teacher : Prof. Vinay Hegde
Course : B.Com
Semester : IV and VI Semester 2020-21
No’s of Students Enrolled : 600
Number of Students Participated

in the Feedback

: 100
Subject taught : Principles of Marketing and Principles of Foreign Exchange
Average Feedback & Score of the Programme : Average Score: 4.025
Feedback Score Range : Lowest Score : 3.7

Highest Score : 4.4

Areas of Performance

Improvement

: Punctuality in conducting classes
Comments (If any) :
Action Taken : The weak area has been intimated.
Remarks : Good

 

Name of the Teacher : Prof. Ravindra Hegde
Course : B.Com
Semester : II and IV Semester 2020-21
No’s of Students Enrolled : 315
Number of Students Participated

in the Feedback

: 60
Subject taught : Business Statistics and Business Mathematics
Average Feedback & Score of the

Programme

: Average Score: 4.376
Feedback Score Range : Lowest Score : 3.9

Highest Score : 4.66

Areas of Performance

Improvement

: Active learning methodology
Comments (If any) :
Action Taken : Improvement suggested
Remarks : Excellent

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

Name of the Teacher : Prof. Anandrao Kumbhar
Course : B.Com
Semester : Semester 2020-21
No’s of Students Enrolled : 360
Number of Students Participated

in the Feedback

: 60
Subject taught : Financial Accounting and Corporate Accounting
Average Feedback & Score of the

Programme

: Average Score: 3.57
Feedback Score Range : Lowest Score : 3.24

Highest Score : 4.2

Areas of Performance

Improvement

: Role as a leader
Comments (If any) :
Action Taken : Suggested to incorporate the weak area.
Remarks : Good

 

FEEDBACK REPORT OF THE INSTITUTION
 

 

GRADE

 

LIBRARY FACILITY

PLAY GROUND / SPORTS FACILITY CULTURAL ACTIVITIES/N.S.S/N.C.C CLEANLINESS READING ROOM  

GRIEVANCES REDRESS CELL

 

DISBURSAL OF SCHOLARSHIP

COMPUTER FACILITIES REMEDIAL CLASSES/ TUTORIALS CANTEEN ATTITUDE AND CO- OPEARATION OF ADMINISTRITATIVE STAFF PRINCIPAL’S AVAILIBILITY AND RESPONSE
EXCELLENT 90 76 130 60 42 18 180 195 70 191 157 181
GOOD 127 103 152 115 54 170 98 78 104 81 88 78
SATISFACTORY 65 104 28 128 96 95 25 30 125 30 55 47
UNSATISFACTORY 30 29 2 9 120 29 9 1 15 10 12 6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

STAFF
EXCELLENT 90 76 130 60 42 18 180 195 70 191 157 181
GOOD 127 103 152 115 54 170 98 78 104 81 88 78
SATISFACTORY 65 104 28 128 96 95 25 30 125 30 55 47
UNSATISFACTORY 30 29 2 9 120 29 9 1 15 10 12 6