| Student Appraisal : Subject-wise : Commerce Faculty | ||||||||||||
| Name of the College : M.E.S. College of Commerce, Sirsi (U.K) | ||||||||||||
|
SNO |
SUBJECTS |
RATING FACTORS – POINT OF SCALE | ||||||||||
| PREPARATION FOR THE CLASS | PANCTUALITY IN CONDUCTING CLASSES | PLANNING AND COMPLETION OF SYLLABUS ON TIME | CLARITY OF PRESENTATION | CLARITY OF EXPRESSION LIKE LANGUAGE AND VOICE | METHODOLOGY USED TO IMPART THE KNOWLEDGE | ACTIVE LEARNING METHODOLOGY USED TO IMPART | AVAILABILITY TO STUDENTS OUTSIDE THE CLASS HOURS | HIS/HER ROLE AS A LEADER | EXAMINATIONS / ASSIGNMENTS GRADED FAIRLY |
AVERAGE |
||
| 1 | Cost Accounting | 4.34 | 4.76 | 4.48 | 4.36 | 3.796 | 4.28 | 3.94 | 4.3 | 4.32 | 4.42 | 4.2996 |
| 2 | Income Tax Law & Practice | 4.16 | 3.56 | 3.56 | 4.16 | 4.16 | 3.32 | 4 | 4.52 | 4.44 | 4.16 | 4.004 |
| 3 | Financial Accounting | 3.2 | 4 | 3.45 | 3 | 3.8 | 4.3 | 3.3 | 3.9 | 3.5 | 3.9 | 3.635 |
| 4 | Management Accounting | 4.44 | 4.72 | 4.68 | 3.92 | 4.24 | 4.44 | 4.2 | 4.48 | 4.2 | 4.36 | 4.368 |
| 5 | Principles & Practice of Auditing | 3.6 | 4.02 | 3.7 | 3.68 | 3.18 | 3.22 | 3.28 | 3.56 | 3.18 | 3.6 | 3.502 |
| 6 | Law & Practice of Banking | 3.46 | 4.2 | 3.65 | 3.8 | 3.54 | 3.33 | 3.25 | 3.43 | 3.24 | 3.8 | 3.57 |
| 7 | Statistics | 4.66 | 4.4 | 4.56 | 4.3 | 4.42 | 4.46 | 3.9 | 4.3 | 4.24 | 4.52 | 4.376 |
| 8 | Commercial Arithmetic | 4.6 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 3.8 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.24 |
| 9 | Business Communication Skill | 3.5 | 4.1 | 3.67 | 3.7 | 3.1 | 3.13 | 3.25 | 3.6 | 3.24 | 3.78 | 3.507 |
| 10 | Entrepreneurship Development | 3.45 | 3.98 | 3.52 | 3.66 | 3.25 | 3.13 | 3.21 | 3.41 | 3.2 | 3.5 | 3.431 |
| 11 | Computer Application in Business | 4.92 | 4.67 | 4.57 | 4.25 | 4.42 | 4.4 | 4.48 | 4.4 | 4.1 | 4.27 | 4.448 |
| 12 | Principles of Foreign Exchange | 3.9 | 3.7 | 3.95 | 4.35 | 4 | 4.1 | 3.85 | 4.15 | 3.85 | 4.4 | 4.025 |
| 13 | Industrial Economics | 4.55 | 4.35 | 4.6 | 4.05 | 3.8 | 4 | 4.1 | 3.95 | 4.45 | 4.6 | 4.245 |
| 14 | English | 4.35 | 3.9 | 4.1 | 3.65 | 3.25 | 3.65 | 4 | 3.75 | 3.6 | 3.65 | 3.79 |
| Average Weightage Score of 20 Students of B.Com I, II & III | ||||||||||||
| Rated the Teacher using the following Five Point Scale : | ||||||||||||
| Unsatisfactory : Less than 2 | Satisfactory : Between 2 and 3 | Good : Between 3 and 4 | Excellent : Between 4 and 5 | |||||||||
| Student Appraisal : Subject-wise : Commerce Faculty
English Industrial Economics Principles of Foreign Exchange Computer Application in Business Entrepreneurship Development Business Communication Skill Commercial Arithmetic Statistics Law & Practice of Banking Principles & Practice of Auditing Management Accounting Financial Accounting Income Tax Law & Practice Cost Accounting 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 |
||||||||||||
STUDENT FEEDBACK ANALYSIS REPORT:
| Name of the Teacher | : | Prof. S. M. Hegde |
| Course | : | B.Com |
| Semester | : | IV & VI Semester 2021-22 |
| No’s of Students Enrolled | : | 480 |
| Number of Students Participated
in the Feedback |
: | 80 |
| Subject taught | : | Income Tax, Corporate Accounting |
| Average Feedback & Score of the
Programme |
: | Average Score: 4 |
| Feedback Score Range | : | Lowest Score : 3.32
Highest Score : 4.52 |
| Areas of Performance
Improvement |
: | Methodology used to impart knowledge needs to
be strengthened. |
| Comments (If any) | : | – |
| Action Taken | : | In face to face contact necessary suggestion has
been given. |
| Remarks | : | Excellent |
| Name of the Teacher | : | Dr. S. K. Hegde | |
| Course | : | B.Com | |
| Semester | : | II & IV Semester 2021-22 | |
| No’s of Students Enrolled | : | 480 | |
| Number of Students Participated
in the Feedback |
: | 80 | |
| Subject taught | : | Managerial Economics and International
Economics |
|
| Average Feedback & Score of the
Programme |
: | Average Score: 4.28 | |
| Feedback Score Range | : | Lowest Score : 3.32
Highest Score : 4.6 |
|
| Areas of Performance
Improvement |
: | Improvement in Leadership | |
| Comments (If any) | : | – | |
| Action Taken | : | The area to be improved has been communicated
to the teacher. |
|
| Remarks | : | Excellent | |
| Name of the Teacher | : | Prof. Rajaneesh Samasgeekar |
| Course | : | B.Com |
| Semester | : | II Semester 2021-22 |
| No’s of Students Enrolled | : | 120 |
| Number of Students Participated
in the Feedback |
: | 20 |
| Subject taught | : | Financial Accounting |
| Average Feedback & Score of the
Programme |
: | Average Score: 3.635 |
| Feedback Score Range | : | Lowest Score : 3
Highest Score : 4.3 |
| Areas of Performance
Improvement |
: | Clarity of presentation |
| Comments (If any) | : | – |
| Action Taken | : | Requisite instruction given. |
| Remarks | : | Good |
| Name of the Teacher | : | Prof. Sudheer Shanbhag |
| Course | : | B.Com |
| Semester | : | VI Semester 2021-22 |
| No’s of Students Enrolled | : | 360 |
| Number of Students Participated
in the Feedback |
: | 60 |
| Subject taught | : | Computer Application in Business |
| Average Feedback & Score of the
Programme |
: | Average Score: 4.192 |
| Feedback Score Range | : | Lowest Score : 3.72
Highest Score : 4.44 |
| Areas of Performance
Improvement |
: | Role as a Leader |
| Comments (If any) | : | – |
| Action Taken | : | Area of Improvement needs to be strengthened. |
| Remarks | : | Excellent |
| Name of the Teacher | : | Prof. Savita Ravindranath |
| Course | : | B.Com |
| Semester | : | II Semester 2021-22 |
| No’s of Students Enrolled | : | 480 |
| Number of Students Participated
in the Feedback |
: | 80 |
| Subject taught | : | Basic English and Additional English |
| Average Feedback & Score of the
Programme |
: | Average Score: 3.79 |
| Feedback Score Range | : | Lowest Score : 3.25
Highest Score : 4.35 |
| Areas of Performance
Improvement |
: | Clarity of Expression, Language and Voice |
| Comments (If any) | : | – |
| Action Taken | : | Area of Improvement passed on to the teacher. |
| Remarks | : | Good |
| Name of the Teacher | : | Prof. Harsha Prabhu |
| Course | : | B.Com |
| Semester | : | IV Semester 2021-22 |
| No’s of Students Enrolled | : | 360 |
| Number of Students Participated
in the Feedback |
: | 60 |
| Subject taught | : | Computer Application in Business |
| Average Feedback & Score of the
Programme |
: | Average Score: 4.448 |
| Feedback Score Range | : | Lowest Score : 4.1
Highest Score : 4.92 |
| Areas of Performance
Improvement |
: | Availability to students outside the class hours. |
| Comments (If any) | : | – |
| Action Taken | : | The Area of Improvement is intimated to the
teacher. |
| Remarks | : | Excellent |
| Name of the Teacher | : | Prof. Anwesha Naik |
| Course | : | B.Com |
| Semester | : | VI Semester 2021-22 |
| No’s of Students Enrolled | : | 600 |
| Number of Students Participated
in the Feedback |
: | 100 |
| Subject taught | : | Management Accounting and Business Law |
| Average Feedback & Score of the
Programme |
: | Average Score: 4.368 |
| Feedback Score Range | : | Lowest Score : 3.92
Highest Score : 4.72 |
| Areas of Performance
Improvement |
: | Clarity of Presentation |
| Comments (If any) | : | – |
| Action Taken | : | Conveyed to the teacher. |
| Remarks | : | Excellent |
| Name of the Teacher | : | Prof. Vinay Hegde |
| Course | : | B.Com |
| Semester | : | IV and VI Semester 2021-22 |
| No’s of Students Enrolled | : | 600 |
| Number of Students Participated
in the Feedback |
: | 100 |
| Subject taught | : | Principles of Marketing and Principles of Foreign Exchange |
| Average Feedback & Score of the Programme | : | Average Score: 4.025 |
| Feedback Score Range | : | Lowest Score : 3.7
Highest Score : 4.4 |
| Areas of Performance
Improvement |
: | Punctuality in conducting classes |
| Comments (If any) | : | – |
| Action Taken | : | The weak area has been intimated. |
| Remarks | : | Good |
| Name of the Teacher | : | Prof. G.T.Hegde |
| Course | : | B.Com |
| Semester | : | II and IV Semester 2021-22 |
| No’s of Students Enrolled | : | 315 |
| Number of Students Participated
in the Feedback |
: | 60 |
| Subject taught | : | Business Statistics |
| Average Feedback & Score of the
Programme |
: | Average Score: 4.376 |
| Feedback Score Range | : | Lowest Score : 3.9
Highest Score : 4.66 |
| Areas of Performance
Improvement |
: | Active learning methodology |
| Comments (If any) | : | – |
| Action Taken | : | Improvement suggested |
| Remarks | : | Excellent |
| FEEDBACK REPORT OF THE INSTITUTION | ||||||||||||
|
GRADE |
LIBRARY FACILITY |
PLAY GROUND / SPORTS FACILITY | CULTURAL ACTIVITIES/N.S.S/N.C.C | CLEANLINESS | READING ROOM |
GRIEVANCES REDRESS CELL |
DISBURSAL OF SCHOLARSHIP |
COMPUTER FACILITIES | REMEDIAL CLASSES/ TUTORIALS | CANTEEN | ATTITUDE AND CO- OPEARATION OF ADMINISTRITATIVE STAFF | PRINCIPAL’S AVAILIBILITY AND RESPONSE |
| EXCELLENT | 90 | 76 | 130 | 60 | 42 | 18 | 180 | 195 | 70 | 191 | 157 | 181 |
| GOOD | 127 | 103 | 152 | 115 | 54 | 170 | 98 | 78 | 104 | 81 | 88 | 78 |
| SATISFACTORY | 65 | 104 | 28 | 128 | 96 | 95 | 25 | 30 | 125 | 30 | 55 | 47 |
| UNSATISFACTORY | 30 | 29 | 2 | 9 | 120 | 29 | 9 | 1 | 15 | 10 | 12 | 6 |
| STAFF | ||||||||||||
| EXCELLENT | 90 | 76 | 130 | 60 | 42 | 18 | 180 | 195 | 70 | 191 | 157 | 181 |
| GOOD | 127 | 103 | 152 | 115 | 54 | 170 | 98 | 78 | 104 | 81 | 88 | 78 |
| SATISFACTORY | 65 | 104 | 28 | 128 | 96 | 95 | 25 | 30 | 125 | 30 | 55 | 47 |
| UNSATISFACTORY | 30 | 29 | 2 | 9 | 120 | 29 | 9 | 1 | 15 | 10 | 12 | 6 |